The three approaches

Zapier is known for simplicity and a huge library of app connections: “when this happens in app A, do that in app B”. Make (formerly Integromat) offers a visual canvas for more complex, branching scenarios. Custom automation is software written for your workflow, running on your own infrastructure, connected through APIs as described in what API integration is.

Quick comparison
FactorZapier-style toolsMake-style toolsCustom automation
Setup speedMinutes to hoursHours to daysDays to weeks
Best forSimple, linear workflowsBranching, multi-step scenariosCore, complex or high-volume processes
Pricing modelPer task/usage tiersPer operation/usage tiersBuild cost + hosting, no per-task fee
Complex logicLimitedGoodUnlimited
Reliability controlsBasic retries and alertsBetter error handlingFully designed: queues, retries, monitoring
Data controlData passes through the vendorData passes through the vendorStays in your environment

General patterns. Features and pricing change — check current plans.

When no-code is the right choice

  • Low volume, simple steps: new form submission → CRM contact → Slack alert.
  • You are still proving the idea: build it in an afternoon to see if it helps before investing.
  • Non-critical workflows: if it fails for an hour, nobody is harmed.
  • No developer available: a team member can build and maintain it.

When custom automation pays off

  • High volume: thousands of runs a day make usage-based pricing painful.
  • Complex rules: many branches, calculations, approvals or exceptions.
  • Reliability matters: orders, payments, compliance or customer commitments depend on it.
  • Sensitive data: you want to control where customer data goes and is stored.
  • It is part of your product or advantage, not just back-office plumbing.

Compare the real cost, not the sticker price

No-code subscriptions look cheap at first. The honest comparison adds up everything over two to three years:

Side by sideWhat to include when comparing cost

No-code platform

  • Subscription that rises with usage tiers
  • Time to build and maintain each automation
  • Workarounds when a connector lacks a feature
  • Limits on run frequency, steps or data size

Custom automation

  • One-off build cost, plus modest hosting
  • Maintenance and monitoring effort
  • No per-task fees as volume grows
  • Exactly the logic you need, with no workaround time

A simple decision framework

ProcessChoosing an approach for each workflow
  1. 1

    List runs per month

    Estimate how often the workflow executes.

  2. 2

    Rate the complexity

    Count branches, exceptions and systems involved.

  3. 3

    Rate the risk

    What does a failure or data leak cost?

  4. 4

    Price both routes

    Estimate a 2–3 year cost for each option.

  5. 5

    Start small, review

    Pilot, measure and move to custom only where it earns it.

Good practice whichever route you take

ChecklistAutomation hygiene checklist
  • Every automation has a named owner and a short description of what it does
  • Failures send an alert to a person, not an inbox nobody reads
  • Credentials use the least access needed and are rotated when staff leave
  • Sensitive data is minimised and not passed through more tools than needed
  • You can see a log of what ran, when and with what result
  • There is a manual fallback if the automation is down

If you are earlier in the journey, start with our guide to where to start with business process automation. And if you are weighing a bespoke build, the same principles apply as in custom software vs. off-the-shelf.